ooh so exciting

the class blog so many posts i like. i feel like joining in the fun.

first up, joanne why are u so angsty om gggg gg?! u sound disillusioned with love and life lol! (as far as i know u havent been dumped recently so be more optimistic!!!!)

well to be fair joanne's posts are quite interesting, and i agree with the logic. however i cant agree that love isnt glamorous based on that argument (even though i have yet to have a gf hahahahaha)...

modeling the process of falling love and creating a function for it is cool and all... and while the function makes the process of falling love seem unglamorous, it doesnt change the fact that the experience is indeed beautiful.

an analogy would be a music maestro playing some hardcore beethoven piece (or in my case MIKA PERFORMING LIVE). the music will wow audiences, but to a physicist who doesnt appreciate music, he could view beethoven's symphony simply as sound waves and wave equations. he may even go as far as to say he knows the symphony far better than beethoven since he can quantify each note with an equation.

perhaps the beauty is not in understanding love fully by modeling it (even if u can get all the correlations and factors right, modeling it fully is a stretch), but rather in experiencing it.

i am going to be trained as an economist and i think the subject is immensely fascinating and useful, but i believe that humanity is far more than just walking "lightning calculator(s) of pleasures and pain". modeling intangible things like falling in love requires one to quantify attraction and chemistry which i think is not possible currently. even then, perhaps there are correlations between factors such as convenience/self-interest and level of attraction that we are unaware of.

so MORAL OF THE STORY IS...................................






i'll see u guys nxt year with a hot gf










AND I'LL BE LOVING IT.